What is the definition of cephalopelvic disproportion

Pelvic minus fetal diameter: value of pelvimetry in the detection of cephalopelvic disproportion

References

  1. 1.

    Lehmann KJ, Busch HP, Wischnik A, Georgi M (1989) Obstetric pelvic measurement with digital image intensifier radiography. Fortschr Rontgenstr 151: 553-557

    Google Scholar

  2. 2.

    Barton J, Garbaciak J, Ryan G (1982) The efficiency of x-ray pelvimetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 143: 304-311

    Google Scholar

  3. 3.

    Campbell JA (1976) X-ray pelvimetry: useful procedure or medical nonsense. J Natl Med Assoc 68: 514-520

    Google Scholar

  4. 4.

    Lundh C, Lindmark G, Wilbrand H (1986) Reliability of radiographic pelvimetry. A methodological study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 65: 411-416

    Google Scholar

  5. 5.

    Parsons MT, Spellacy WN (1985) Prospective randomized study of X-ray pelvimetry in primigravida. Obstet Gynecol 66: 76-79

    Google Scholar

  6. 6.

    Wischnik A, Nalepa E, Lehmann KJ, Wentz KU, Georgi M (1993) Prevention of mechanical birth trauma Part I: The computer-aided simulation of the birth process with the help of magnetic resonance imaging and finite element analysis. Obstetrics Frauenheilkd 53: 35-41

    Google Scholar

  7. 7.

    Wischnik A, Lehmann KJ, Nalepa E, Wentz KU, Georgi M, Melchert F (1992) Magnetic resonance tomography as the basis of biomechanical analysis. Fortschr Rontgenstr 157: 333-337

    Google Scholar

  8. 8.

    Lehmann KJ, Wischnik A, Nalepa E, Georgi M (1993) Dynamic biomechanical analysis of deformation stress during labor by “finite elements analysis” of MRI data. In: Lemke HU, Inamura K, Jaffee CC, Felix R (eds) Computer assisted radiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 403-407

    Google Scholar

  9. 9.

    Wischnik A, Lehmann KJ, Ziegler M, Georgi M, Melchert F (1992) Does the “fat basin” exist? Quantitative computed tomographic examinations. Z Obstetrics Perinatol 196: 247-252

    Google Scholar

  10. 10.

    Johnson GC (1986) Pelvimetry revisited. AJR 147: 409-410

    Google Scholar

  11. 11.

    Bithell JF, Stewart AM (1975) Prenatal irradiation and childhood malignancy: a review of British data from the Oxford Survey. Br J Cancer 31: 271-287

    Google Scholar

  12. 12.

    Lundh C, Lindmark G, Wilbrand H, Ytterbergh C (1984) Radiographic pelvimetry - its use and possible radiation risk. Ups J Med Sci 89: 135-146

    Google Scholar

  13. 13.

    MacMahon B (1962) Prenatal x-ray exposure and childhood cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 28: 1173-1191

    Google Scholar

  14. 14.

    Reekie D, Davidson M, Davidson JK (1967) The radiation hazard in radiography of the female abdomen and pelvis. Br J Radiol 40: 849-854

    Google Scholar

  15. 15.

    Stewart A, Kneale GW (1970) Radiation dose effects in relation to obstetric x-rays and childhood cancers. Lancet I: 1185-1188

    Google Scholar

  16. 16.

    Stewart A (1973) An epidemiologist takes a look at radiation risks. DHEW Publication No. (FDA) 73-8024 BRH / DBE 73-2. Food and Drug Administration, Bureau of Radiological Health, Rockville, Maryland

    Google Scholar

  17. 17.

    Lundh C, Lindmark G, Wilbrand H (1986) Reliability of radiographic pelvimetry. A methodological study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 65: 411-416

    Google Scholar

  18. 18.

    Miller K (1986) Frequency and efficacy of pelvimetry: Saskatoon experience. J Can Assoc Radiol 37: 273-275

    Google Scholar

  19. 19.

    Wischnik A, Lehmann KJ, Busch HP, Englmeier KH, Sterescu D, Georgi M, Melchert F (1989) New aspects of radiological pelvimetry. Z Obstetrics Perinatol 193: 145–151

    Google Scholar

  20. 20.

    Adam P, Alberge Y, Castellano S, Kassab M, Escude B (1985) Pelvimetry by digital radiography. Clin Radiol 36: 327-330

    Google Scholar

  21. 21.

    Dobson J, Nelson J (1988) CT pelvimetry: replacing conventional with digital. Radiography 54: 18-19

    Google Scholar

  22. 22.

    Kopelman JN, Duff P, Karl TR, Shipul AH, Read JA (1986) Computed tomographic pelvimetry in the evaluation of breech presentation. Obstet Gynecol 68: 455-458

    Google Scholar

  23. 23.

    Lotz H, Ekelund L, Hietala SO, Eriksson L, Wicklund DE, Wickman G (1987) Low-dose pelvimetry with biplane digital radiography. Acta Radiol 28: 577-580

    Google Scholar

  24. 24.

    Suramo I, Torniainen P, Jouppila P, Kirkinen P, Lahde S (1984) A low-dose CT-pelvimetry. Br J Radiol 57: 35-37

    Google Scholar

  25. 25.

    Wentz KU, Lehmann KJ, Wischnik A, Lange S, Suchalla R (1994) Pelvimetry using various magnetic resonance imaging techniques vs. digital image intensifier radiography: accuracy, time requirement and energy load. Obstetrics Frauenheilkd 54: 204-212

    Google Scholar

  26. 26.

    Dudenhausen JW, Pfanmatter T, Marincek B, Schulthess GK von, Huch A (1989) Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance tomography. Obstetrics Frauenheilkd 49: 477-480

    Google Scholar

  27. 27.

    Powell MC, Worthington BS, Symonds EM (1987) Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in obstetrics and gynecology. Prog Obstet Gynecol 6: 311-331

    Google Scholar

  28. 28.

    Sigmund G, Bauer M, Henne K, DeGregorio G, Wenz W (1991) Technique of magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis in obstetrics. Fortschr Rontgenstr 154: 370-374

    Google Scholar

  29. 29.

    Stark DD, McCarthy SM, Filly RA, Parer JT, Hricak H, Callen PW (1985) Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging. AJR 144: 947-950

    Google Scholar

  30. 30.

    Tesseraux M, Breitbach GP, Wörner H, Kramann B, Bastert G (1989) Possibilities of magnetic resonance tomographic pelvimetry. Arch Gynecol Obstet 245: 118

    Google Scholar

  31. 31.

    Urhahn R, Lehnen H, Drobnitzky M, Klose KC, Günther RW (1991) Ultra-fast pelvimetry using snapshot FLASH MRI comparison with spin echo and FLASH technology. Fortschr Rontgenstrasse 155: 432-435

    Google Scholar

  32. 32.

    Woerner H, Brill G, Frenzel T, Stoll H, Tesseraux M (1988) Pelvimetry using magnetic resonance tomography. Fortschr Rontgenstrasse 149: 378-382

    Google Scholar

  33. 33.

    Lehmann KJ (1993) Experimental and clinical studies on the current value of pelvimetry with special consideration of digital radiography and magnetic resonance tomography. Habilitation thesis, Mannheim

    Google Scholar

  34. 34.

    Wischnik A, Lehmann KJ, Labeit D, Werner T, Gerlach-Schmidt H, Hiltmann WD, Melchert F (1993) A knowledge-based system for the interpretation of pelvimetric findings. Z Obstetrics Perinatol 197: 266-274

    Google Scholar

  35. 35.

    Guthmann H (1929) The radiological measurement of the conjugata vera. Fortschr Rontgenstrasse 36: 257-262

    Google Scholar

  36. 36.

    Borell U, Fernström I (1960) Radiologic pelvimetry. Acta Radiol 191: 1-97

    Google Scholar

  37. 37.

    Alder C, Aebi S, Bernhard M (1987) The importance of radiological pelvic measurement. Obstetrics Frauenheilkd 47: 483-486

    Google Scholar

  38. 38.

    Kelly KM, Madden DA, Arcarese JS, Barnett M, Brown RF (1975) The utilization and efficacy of pelvimetry. AJR 125: 66-74

    Google Scholar

  39. 39.

    Lehmann KJ, Wischnik A, Zahn K, Georgi M (1992) Do the bony pelvic dimensions relevant for obstetrics change? A retrospective analysis of computed tomography pelvic images. Fortschr Rontgenstrasse 156: 425-428

    Google Scholar

  40. 40.

    Abitbol MM (1988) Evolution of the ischial spine and of the pelvic floor in the Hominoidea. Am J Phys Anthropol 75: 53-67

    Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute for Clinical Radiology, Mannheim, Germany

    K. J. Lehmann & M. Georgi

  2. Women's Clinic, Mannheim Clinic, Theodor Kutzer Ufer, D-68135, Mannheim, Germany

    A. Wischnik & H. Gerlach-Schmidt

additional information

Correspondence to: K. J. Lehmann

About this article

Cite this article

Lehmann, K.J., Wischnik, A., Gerlach-Schmidt, H. et al. Pelvic minus fetal diameter: value of pelvimetry in the detection of cephalopelvic disproportion. Eur. Radiol.5, 401-405 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00184952

Download citation

Key words

  • Pelvis
  • Cephalopelvic proportion
  • Pelvimetry
  • Fetometry
  • Digital radiography
  • Biomechanics